| 辛乐宇1,2,3，张泽鹏1，萨拉麦提·艾迪热斯2,3，过利敏2,3，杨海燕1.不同脱酸工艺对红花籽油储藏品质的影响[J].中国油脂,2023,48(4):.[XIN Leyu1,2,3, ZHANG Zepeng1, SALAMET Edirs2,3, GUO Limin2,3, YANG Haiyan1.Effect of deacidification process on storage quality of safflower seed oil[J].China Oils and Fats,2023,48(4):.] |
| 不同脱酸工艺对红花籽油储藏品质的影响 |
| Effect of deacidification process on storage quality of safflower seed oil |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 红花籽油 超声波辅助乙醇萃取脱酸 碱炼脱酸 储藏品质 货架期 |
| 英文关键词:safflower seed oil ultrasonic assisted ethanol extraction deacidification alkali deacidification storage quality shelf life |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 706 |
| 全文下载次数: 536 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 为了选择合适的脱酸工艺，提高红花籽油的储藏品质，以脱胶红花籽油为原料，采用碱炼脱酸和超声波辅助乙醇萃取（UAEE）脱酸工艺制备脱酸红花籽油，并采用Schaal烘箱法进行加速氧化试验，比较加速氧化期间脱酸红花籽油的理化指标（酸值、过氧化值、p-茴香胺值）、脂质伴随物（α-生育酚、总酚、总甾醇）含量，以及体外抗氧化能力（DPPH、ABTS自由基清除能力），对比分析2种脱酸工艺对红花籽油储藏品质的影响，并预测货架期的差异。结果表明：随着储藏时间的延长，2种脱酸红花籽油的理化品质、脂质伴随物含量、体外抗氧化能力均呈下降趋势；与碱炼脱酸工艺相比，UAEE脱酸工艺制备的红花籽油储藏品质更优；2种脱酸红花籽油的氧化均符合一级氧化动力学反应，通过动力学方程预测20℃和25℃密封避光条件下，UAEE脱酸红花籽油的货架期分别约为28 d和27 d，而碱炼脱酸红花籽油的分别约为22 d和21 d。综上，与碱炼脱酸相比，UAEE脱酸能提升红花籽油的储藏品质，有利于延长红花籽油的货架期。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| In order to select a suitable deacidification process to improve the storage quality of safflower seed oil(SSO), with the degumming SSO as the material, the deacidified SSO were prepared by alkali refining deacidification and ultrasonic assisted ethanol extraction(UAEE) deacidification, and an accelerated oxidation test was carried out by Schaal oven method, and the physicochemical parameters (acid value, peroxide value, p-anisidine value), lipid concomitants (α-tocopherol, total phenols, total sterols) content and in vitro antioxidant capacity (DPPH, ABTS radical scavenging capacity) of deacidified SSO during accelerated oxidation were compared so as to analyze the effects of the two deacidification processes on the storage quality of SSO. In addition, the differences in shelf life of two kinds of deacidified SSO were predicted. The results showed that the physicochemical quality, lipid concomitant content and in vitro antioxidant capacity of both deacidified SSO decreased with storage time prolonging. Compared with alkali deacidification, the UAEE deacidification process was superior in the storage quality of SSO. The oxidation of both deacidified SSO were fitted with the first-order oxidation kinetic reaction, and the kinetic equations predicted the shelf life of approximately 28 d and 27 d for UAEE deacidified SSO under sealed and light-proof conditions at 20℃ and 25℃, compared to approximately 22 d and 21 d for alkali deacidified SSO. In conclusion, UAEE deacidification can improve the storage quality of SSO and help to extend the shelf life of SOO compared with alkali deacidification. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
